Legal Opinion

Hudson v. Hudson

California Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1900No. L.A. No. 716PublishedCited by 12 opinions

The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the Court

CHIPMAN, C.

Divorce on the ground of extreme cruelty. Plaintiff had judgment, from which defendant appeals. She also appeals from sundry orders hereinafter referred to. There is no brief for respondent. The record is in a very unsatisfactory condition, and it has been with much difficulty that we have been able to unravel its perplexities and ascertain just what alleged errors are properly before us. The record is attempted to be brought here by bill of exceptions; we will endeavor to follow appellant’s points as made in her brief.

1. The demurrer on the ground of want of sufficient facts was…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  2. Hyde v. BoyleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  3. In re GatesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Landers v. LandersCalifornia Supreme Court · 1890
  5. Tibbets v. Riverside Banking Co.California Supreme Court · 1893

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Spear v. United RailroadsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1911
  2. Mendocino County v. PetersCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905
  3. Turlock Golf & County Club v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
  4. Murphy v. StellingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1903
  5. Estate of CazaurangCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API