Legal Opinion
Delorme v. Stauss
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 30, 1924No. 11406PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Watts.
The “case” contains the following:
“The two above-entitled cases were tried together by consent of the attorneys representing the respective parties, and these cases arose out of the same collision, at the same time and place. The first-mentioned case was an action for damages arising out of personal injuries suffered by Murat D. De Lorme, and was for the sum of $1,000. The other case was a case brought by Lula T. De Lorme, in which her husband was joined, solely for compliance with the statute, and consisted of two causes of action;…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Rucker v. SmokeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1892
- Jones v. Atlantic Coast Line R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
- Walker v. LeeSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Sims, Admr. v. EleazerSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1921
- Crawford v. Charleston-Isle of Palms Traction Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1923
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Fisher v. J.H. Sheridan Co., Inc.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1936
- Worth v. WorthWyoming Supreme Court · 1935
- Powell v. A. K. Brown Motor Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1942
- Watson v. SprottSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1926
- Smith v. BulmanSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1941