Legal Opinion

Frieslander v. Mahon

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided May 20, 1981No. 80-12PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RYDER, Judge.

Daniel and Sandra Frieslander appeal from a judgment of foreclosure entered in favor of Mary E. Mahon, P.A. We reverse.

Appellee filed a complaint against appellants and Billie J. Frieslander, co-owner with appellant Daniel of the home, seeking to foreclose a mortgage given to secure a promissory note for criminal defense attorney’s fees. Appellants signed a promissory note requiring payment of $10,000.00 plus 9% interest in monthly installments of $207.59. Appellants signed a mortgage containing an acceleration clause on their home to secure the note. The home was titled in the…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Paschall v. Pioneer Savings & Loan Co.Court of Appeals of Texas · 1898
  2. First National Bank v. HollinsworthSupreme Court of Iowa · 1889
  3. Holden v. Farwell, Ozmun, Kirk & Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1947
  4. Winchester v. Florida Electric Supply, Inc.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
  5. Briggs v. Iowa Savings Loan Ass'nSupreme Court of Iowa · 1901

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Crum v. United States Fidelity and Guar. Co.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1985
  2. McElwain Associates, Inc. v. CulbrethDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1982
  3. Alfred D. Bieley, P.A. v. MurdersDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API