Legal Opinion

San Jose Parking, Inc. v. Superior Court

California Court of Appeal

Decided August 28, 2003No. H024871PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P.J.

In its petition for a writ of mandate, San Jose Parking, Inc. (SJP) asks us to direct the trial court to vacate its order finding that Redevelopment Agency of San Jose (Agency) has the right to condemn SJP’s interest in the Fountain Alley parking lot. Because we conclude that SJP does not have a real property interest in the Fountain Alley parking lot, we will grant the request for writ relief.

FACTS AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

Agency owns real property in downtown San Jose, commonly known as the Fountain Alley parking lot.

In 1997, SJP and Agency entered into an agreement…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Helvering v. San Joaquin Fruit & Investment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
  2. Richardson v. HardwickSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  3. Golden West Baseball Co. v. City of AnaheimCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
  4. County of San Diego v. MillerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  5. Palo Alto Town & Country Village, Inc. v. Bbtc CompanyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Spinks v. Equity Residential Briarwood ApartmentsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2009
  2. United States v. Swan, PeterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2006
  3. Richardson v. FrancCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
  4. Wachovia Bank v. LIFETIME INDUSTRIES, INC.California Court of Appeal · 2006
  5. Kent v. County of YoloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2019

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API