Legal Opinion

Power v. Gum

Montana Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1886PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from First District, Gallatin County. ■ The opinion states the facts.

1Opinion of the CourtGalbraith, J.

This action was commenced in the probate court of Gallatin county. After a trial and judgment in that court an appeal was taken to the district court. The *6complaint, after the usual allegations as to partnership, is in substance as follows: “ That the defendant is indebted to the plaintiffs in the sum of three hundred and forty dollars and fifty cents, for the balance of an account for goods, wares and merchandise sold and delivered by the plaintiffs to the defendant, and for freighting done by plaintiffs for the defendant, and for money paid by plaintiffs for defendant’s use, the whole of…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Doll v. GoodCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Harris v. ShontzMontana Supreme Court · 1870
  3. Higgins v. GermaineMontana Supreme Court · 1870

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Merrigan v. EnglishMontana Supreme Court · 1889
  2. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1907
  3. Barber v. BriscoeMontana Supreme Court · 1888
  4. Equity Co-operative Ass'n v. Equity Co-operative Milling Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1922
  5. Glass v. Basin & Bay State Mining Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1906

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API