Legal Opinion
Midwest Air Filters Pacific, Inc. v. Finn.
California Supreme Court
Decided July 13, 1927No. Docket No. S.F. 12375PublishedCited by 10 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
' THE COURT.
This appeal has been prosecuted by the defendants from a judgment of the superior court in and for the city and county of San Francisco. The cause was taken over by this court after decision by the district court of appeal, first appellate district, division two. (51 Cal. App. Dec. 458.) We adopt the following .portion of the opinion of that court as containing a correct statement of the facts giving rise to this litigation.
“This case was tried before the court sitting without a jury and resulted in a judgment in favor of plaintiff and against both defendants in the sum of…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Whitney v. WymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1880
- Vallejo & Northern R.R. v. Reed Orchard Co.California Supreme Court · 1915
- Tulare Irrigation District v. ShepardSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
- Erkenbrecher v. GrantCalifornia Supreme Court · 1921
- Mokelumne Hill Canal & Mining Co. v. WoodburyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- Langdon L. Skarda, Carolyn A. Skarda, Lynell G. Skarda, Kathryn B. Skarda, Cash T. Skarda and Annabel S. Skarda v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Caldwell v. RoachWyoming Supreme Court · 1932
- Imperial Paper & Color Corp. v. SampsellCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1940
- Terrell v. Industrial CommissionCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1973
- Polk v. Unknown Trustees, Successors & Assigns of Three-In-One Oil & Gas Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1956
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.