Simpson v. Fireman's Fund Insurance
District Court, N.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
*393ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION
WILKEN, District Judge.
This case arises from the adoption of an amended leave of absence policy by Defendant Fireman’s Fund Insurance Company (FFIC) to terminate employees who were participants in Defendant Fireman’s Fund Medical Plan (Medical Plan) and who were on approved medical leave but were unable to return to work, with the alleged intent of preventing them from continuing to receive benefits under the Medical Plan. Plaintiff James W. Simpson moves for class certification under Rules 23(a) and (b)(1) and (b)(2), or alternatively…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Lewis v. CaseySupreme Court of the United States · 1996
- General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Califano v. YamasakiSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Hanlon v. Chrysler Corp.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1998
- Blackie v. BarrackCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Lozano v. AT & T Wireless Services, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
- Astiana v. Kashi Co.District Court, S.D. California · 2013
- Kanawi v. Bechtel Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2008
- Wolph v. Acer America Corp.District Court, N.D. California · 2011
- Costelo v. ChertoffDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.