Cordero v. Mirecle Cab Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, the plaintiffs appeal (1), as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Ruditzky, J.), dated November 2, 2006, as granted that branch of the motion *708of the defendant Mirecle Cab Corp. which was, in effect, pursuant to CPLR 3126 to preclude them from offering certain evidence at trial based on spoliation of evidence, and (2) from an order of the same court dated January 5, 2007, which denied their motion, denominated as one for leave to renew and reargue, but which was, in actuality, one for leave…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Denoyelles v. GallagherAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Barahona v. Trustees of Columbia UniversityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Dennis v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- O'Reilly v. YavorskiyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
- McLaughlin v. BrouilletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Somma v. RichardtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Fotiou v. GoodmanAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
- Shay v. Mozer, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011
- Weiss v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
- Eremina v. ScpartaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.