Legal Opinion
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Barclays Bank PLC
District Court, E.D. California
Decided May 22, 2015No. 2:13-cv-2093-TLN-DADPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
AMENDED ORDER
TROY L. NUNLEY, District Judge.
The matter is before the Court on Defendants Barclays Bank PLC (“Barclays”), Daniel Brin (“Brin”), Scott Connelly (“Connelly”), Karen Levine (“Levine”), and Ryan Smith’s (“Smith”) (collectively “Defendants”) Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer (ECF No. 44) Plaintiff Federal Energy Regulatory Commission’s (“FERC”) Petition to Affirm Civil Penalties (ECF No. 1). For the reasons discussed below, Defendants’ Motion is DENIED.
BACKGROUND
On July 16, 2013, following a multi-year investigation and proceeding, FERC issued an order assessing…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Van Dusen v. BarrackSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Sprewell v. Golden State WarriorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
- Santa Fe Industries, Inc. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Riggs v. CurranCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2017
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. City Power Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Maxim Power Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- F.E.R.C. v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.