Legal Opinion
Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Silkman
District Court, D. Massachusetts
Decided April 11, 2016No. CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-13054-DPW, CIVIL ACTION NO. 13-13056-DPWPublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER REGARDING MOTIONS TO DISMISS'
DOUGLAS P. WOODLOCK, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Two petitions by the Federal Energy Commission (“FERC”) seeking affirmance *688of two of its orders assessing civil penalties have been pending before me. One petition (Case No. 13-cv-13056) seeks affirmance of a civil penalty against Lincoln Paper and Tissue Company (“Lincoln”). The second (Case No. 13-cv-13054) seeks affir-mance of a civil penalty against Richard Silkman and Competitive Energy Services, LLC (“CES”). Both penalties relate to participation by the respondents in the “Day-Ahead Load…
2Cases cited39 opinions
- Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. Mead Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Affiliated Ute Citizens of Utah v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Bragdon v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- FERC v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2020
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. City Power Marketing, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2016
- Federal Energy Regulatory Commission v. Maxim Power Corp.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 2016
- F.E.R.C. v. SilkmanDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2019
- Fed. Energy Regulatory Comm'n v. Powhatan Energy Fund, LLCDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2018
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.