Legal Opinion

Sampson v. Ambrose

Appellate Court of Illinois

Decided April 17, 1984No. 82—2705PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Stamos

Plaintiffs Jack A. Sampson and Ruth Sampson sued defendant John C. Ambrose for the balance due plus interest on an installment note executed by defendant Ambrose. Defendant raised the defense of usury. Following a hearing, the trial court found for plaintiffs in the amount of $6,507.70. Defendant, who is an attorney, appeals pro se.

After the notice of appeal was filed, plaintiffs moved to dismiss on the grounds that the appeal was untimely filed. The motion was accompanied by a copy of the half-sheet which indicated that judgment had been entered for plaintiffs on July 22, 1982. The notice of…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Berzana v. MezykAppellate Court of Illinois · 1980
  2. Jones v. City of CartervilleAppellate Court of Illinois · 1950

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Servio v. Paul Roberts Auto Sales, Inc.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1991
  2. City of Chicago v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  3. City of Chicago v. American National Bank & Trust Co.Appellate Court of Illinois · 1988
  4. National Collegiate Student Loan Trust 2007-4 v. PhelpsAppellate Court of Illinois · 2025

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API