Clinchfield Coal Co. v. District 28, United Mine Workers
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
1Per curiam
The United Mine Workers of America, Local 1098 and District 28 appeal from the district court’s order vacating an arbitral decision against the Clinchfield Coal Company.
Clinchfield has extensive coal operations in Virginia, a substantial portion of which are licensed out to independent contractors. Article IA Section (h) of the collective bargaining agreement signed with the Union provides that such licensing is prohibited “unless the licensing out does not cause or result in the layoff of Employees of the Employer.”
In May 1982, Clinchfield laid off approximately 35% of its employees in…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
- Clinchfield Coal Company v. District 28, United Mine Workers of America & Local Union 1452, Westmoreland Coal Company, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1983
- Clinchfield Coal Co. v. United Mine Workers of America District 28, Local Union 1098District Court, W.D. Virginia · 1983
3Cited by3 opinions
- Clinchfield Coal Company v. District 28, United Mine Workers Of America & Umwa, Local Union No. 1098Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984
- Edward Hines Lumber Company of Oregon v. Lumber and Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588 and Central Oregon District Council, LpiwCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Edward Hines Lumber Company of Oregon v. Lumber and Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588 and Central Oregon District Council, LpiwCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985