Legal Opinion

Edward Hines Lumber Company of Oregon v. Lumber and Sawmill Workers Local No. 2588 and Central Oregon District Council, Lpiw

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided June 25, 1985No. 84-3503Published

1Opinion of the Court

764 F.2d 631

119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 3210, 103 Lab.Cas. P 11,532

EDWARD HINES LUMBER COMPANY OF OREGON, Plaintiff-Appellee,

v.

LUMBER AND SAWMILL WORKERS LOCAL NO. 2588 and Central Oregon

District Council, LPIW, Defendants-Appellants.

No. 84-3503.

United States Court of Appeals,

Ninth Circuit.

Argued and Submitted Sept. 7, 1984.

Decided June 25, 1985.

1

David H. Wilson, Jr., Larry K. Amburgey, Bullard, Korshoj, Smith & Jernstedt, Portland, Or., for plaintiff-appellee.

2

Bernard Jollis, Michael T. Garone, Jolles, Sokol & Bernstein, Portland, Or., for defendants-appellants.

3

Appeal from the United States District…

Also in this document: Dissent.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. United Steelworkers v. Warrior & Gulf Navigation Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  2. United Steelworkers v. Enterprise Wheel & Car Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  3. United Steelworkers v. American Manufacturing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1960
  4. W. R. Grace & Co. v. Local Union 759, International Union of the United Rubber, Cork, Linoleum & Plastic WorkersSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. George Day Construction Co., Inc. v. United Brotherhood of Carpenters and Joiners of America, Local 354Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1984

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API