Legal Opinion

Bill Heard Chevrolet Co. v. Thomas

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided October 19, 2001No. 1000584PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Bill Heard Chevrolet Company ("Heard") and Mayflower National Life Insurance Company ("Mayflower") appeal from the trial court's order conditionally certifying two classes of plaintiffs as to certain claims in an action pending in the Russell Circuit Court. Because we conclude that the trial court failed to perform the rigorous analysis required in certifying a class and failed to allow Heard and Mayflower an adequate opportunity to present any evidence in opposition to the proposed conditional certification order, we reverse and remand with instructions.

Background and Facts1

James E. Thomas…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Dianne Castano v. The American Tobacco CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1996
  2. Ex Parte Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1996
  3. Ex Parte Household Retail Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1999
  4. Ex Parte Green Tree Financial Corp.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1998
  5. Ex Parte Citicorp Acceptance Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1997

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Latham v. Department of CorrectionsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2005
  2. Ex Parte Caremark RX, Inc.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2006
  3. Akilah Louise Wofford v. M.J. Edwards & Sons Funeral Home, Inc.Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2017
  4. CIT Communication Finance Corp. v. McFadden, Lyon & Rouse, L.L.C.Supreme Court of Alabama · 2009
  5. Houston County Health Care Authority v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Alabama · 2006

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API