Legal Opinion

Woodmont, Inc. v. Daniels

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided April 25, 1961No. 6587PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

LEWIS, Circuit Judge.

This appeal presents a post-trial problem requiring the application of the law of Utah as it pertains to interest allowable upon judgments obtained in the United States courts with jurisdiction based upon diversity of citizenship. Appellees obtained such a judgment which this court affirmed in its entirety after considering contentions made both upon appeal and cross-appeal. Woodmont, Inc. v. Daniels, 10 Cir., 274 F.2d 132. An effort by appellees to obtain further review of their cross-appeal by certiorari to the United States Supreme Court was denied by that court.…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Bernhardt v. Polygraphic Co. of America, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
  2. T. & M. Transp. Co. v. S. W. Shattuck Chemical Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1947
  3. Ferrea v. TubbsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  4. Le Vine v. WhitehouseUtah Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Beeler v. American Trust Co.California Supreme Court · 1946

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Clyde A. Perkins v. Standard Oil Company of CaliforniaCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1973
  2. Sanford Bros. Boats, Inc. v. Dalvis VidrineCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. Elizabeth Margaret Dallison and Max Dallison v. Sears, Roebuck and Co., a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1962
  4. Huddell v. LevinDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1975
  5. Casto v. Arkansas-Louisiana Gas Co.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1977

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API