Gittel v. Abram
Court of Appeals of Wisconsin
1Opinion of the Court
VERGERONT, EJ.
¶ 1. This appeal arises out of a contest over the will of Nickolas Persha. Ruth Abram, the only beneficiary under the will and the personal representative, sought to have the will admitted to probate. One of Persha's siblings, Mary Gittel, objected on the grounds that Persha lacked testamentary capac ity to make a will and the will was the result of Abram's undue influence. The trial court ruled that Persha lacked testamentary capacity, Abram had failed to rebut the presumption of undue influence, and the will should not be admitted to probate, and it ordered Persha's estate to…
2Cases cited19 opinions
- State v. HolmesWisconsin Supreme Court · 1982
- State ex rel. M.L.B. v. D.G.H.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1985
- Burkes v. HalesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1991
- In re the Promulgation of the Rules of Civil Procedure for the StateWisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- State v. ClarkCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1993
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- State v. MorfordWisconsin Supreme Court · 2004
- Larry v. HarrisWisconsin Supreme Court · 2008
- Operton v. Labor & Industry Review CommissionCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2016
- Estate of Wheeler v. FrancoCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Larry v. HarrisCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2007
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.