Legal Opinion
Bryceland v. AT&T CORP.
Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)
Decided September 12, 2003No. 05-01-00552-CVPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
Opinion by Justice MALONEY.
Charles Bryceland, Karl D. Brawner, and William Carl Christensen (collectively Bryceland), individually and on behalf of other subscribers to AT&T’s Digital PCS wireless and Digital One Rate service from October 2,1996 to December 15,1999 sued AT&T Corporation and AT&T Wireless, Inc. (collectively AT&T) for fraud in the inducement, negligent misrepresentation, deceptive trade practices, and breach of contract. AT&T moved for summary judgment alleging that the Federal Communication Act of 1934, 47 U.S.C. § 332(c)(3)(A) (2001) (the Act), preempts all state…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Ernst & Young, L.L.P. v. Pacific Mutual Life Insurance Co.Texas Supreme Court · 2001
- Continental Airlines, Inc. v. KieferTexas Supreme Court · 1996
- Zep Manufacturing Co. v. Harthcock, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1992
- Union Ink Co., Inc. v. AT&T CORP.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2002
- Kiefer v. Continental Airlines, Inc., Texas Court of Appeals, 1st District (Houston)1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.