Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Pickett v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 1996No. 94-874PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

We are asked to evaluate the February 20, 1991 order for Noll compliance. For the reasons to follow, we find that Noll has been met.

The commission explicitly stated why wage loss compensation was denied—claimant could return to her former job. This conclusion alone, supported by “some evidence,” can sustain a denial of wage loss compensation. State ex rel. Chora v. Indus. Comm. (1996), 74 Ohio St.3d 238, 658 N.E.2d 276. Full medical release implies an ability to return at a preinjury capacity. This in turn implies a return to the preinjury rate of pay. Thus, a full medical release equates to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State ex rel. B.O.C. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1991
  2. State ex rel. Chora v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1996

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. American National Can Co. v. Indus. Comm., 06ap-1209 (8-16-2007)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. State ex rel. Pickett v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1996

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API