Legal Opinion

Christensen v. Kiewit-Murdock Investment Corp.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided March 26, 1987No. 814, Docket 86-7964PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

TIMBERS, Circuit Judge:

Appellants Charles S. Christensen and others (“appellants”) appeal from that part of a judgment entered November 14, 1986 in the District of Connecticut, Ellen Bree Burns, District Judge, which denied their application to recover attorneys’ fees and costs from appellee Kiewit-Murdock Investment Corporation (“Kiewit Corp.”). The judgment also dismissed as moot appellants’ action under the federal securities laws and New York State common law; appellants do not appeal from that part of the judgment.

Appellants’ action arose out of a merger of appellee The Continental…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
  2. Singleton v. WulffSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Mills v. Electric Auto-Lite Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Deposit Guaranty National Bank v. RoperSupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  5. F. D. Rich Co. v. United States Ex Rel. Industrial Lumber Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Savoie v. Merchants BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  2. Savoie v. Merchants BankCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1996
  3. Ramirez v. DeCosterDistrict Court, D. Maine · 2000
  4. Austen v. Catterton Partners V, LPDistrict Court, D. Connecticut · 2011
  5. Encarnacion Ex Rel. George v. BarnhartDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2002

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API