Legal Opinion

Heidner v. St. Paul & Tacoma Lumber Co.

Washington Supreme Court

Decided May 11, 1923No. 17551PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtParker, J.

— The plaintiff Heidner, a resident of Tacoma, in this state, and a citizen of the United States, commenced this action in the superior court for Pierce county, seeking recovery of damages for an alleged breach of a contract he claims to have entered into in his own behalf as principal with the defendant lumber company in December, 1915, for the purchase of 500,000 feet of lumber to he manufactured and de*653livered by the lumber company in about six months, “f. a. s. steamer or vessel Tacoma Harbor,” for shipment to F. A. Sohst at Hamburg, Germany, while the world war between Germany and other…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
  2. Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
  3. Bernheim v. BlochAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1904

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Takahashi v. Pepper Tank & Contracting Co.Wyoming Supreme Court · 1942
  2. Strauss v. Schweizerische KreditanstaltDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1942

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API