Legal Opinion
Strauss v. Schweizerische Kreditanstalt
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided June 20, 1942PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
RIFKIND, District Judge.
On defendant’s petition this cause was removed from the New York Supreme Court on the ground that the action is one arising under the laws of the United States. Plaintiff now moves to have it remanded. The following facts appear on the face of the complaint: In July, 1939, plaintiff deposited with the defendant, a Swiss corporation, in Zurich, Switzerland, the sum of 192,117.35 Swiss francs, pursuant to the terms of an agreement entered into, at Vienna, Austria, by the plaintiff with one Pichler, a citizen and resident of Germany, as security for plaintiff’s…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Gully v. First Nat. Bank in MeridianSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- New York Life Insurance v. StathamSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Hanger v. AbbottSupreme Court of the United States · 1868
- Cummings v. ChicagoSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- First Nat. Bank of Canton v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1920
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- John Hancock Mut. Life Insurance v. United Office & Professional Workers of AmericaDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 1950
- Produce Terminal Realty Corp. v. New York, NH & HR Co.District Court, D. Massachusetts · 1953
- Levitt & Sons, Inc. v. Prince George County Congress of Racial EqualityDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1963
- Adams v. State of CaliforniaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1959