Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

Lyday v. Southern Railway Company

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided January 20, 1961No. 95PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

The plaintiff insists that the permit introduced in evidence was not for the removal of his trailer. Be that as it may, there is no evidence introduced in the trial below tending to show that the plaintiff or- his agent, Revell, obtained any permit to move the plain tiff's trailer over Jim’s Branch Road. Furthermore, there is no contention on the part of the plaintiff that any such permit was ever requested or obtained for such purpose. The permit obtained by Revell on 9 October 1959 only authorized the removal of a house trailer from Asheville to Black Mountain over route U.S. 70.

The…

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. GoodmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
  2. Continental Improvement Co. v. SteadSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  3. State v. . CopeSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1933
  4. Godwin v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1941
  5. Aldridge Ex Rel. Aldridge v. HastySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1954

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. White v. MoteSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
  2. Murray v. Bensen Aircraft CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  3. Byers v. STANDARD CONCRETE PRODUCTS COMPANYSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1966
  4. Scarborough v. IngramSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
  5. Makas v. Hillhaven, Inc.District Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1984

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API