Legal Opinion
Goff v. Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern RR Corp.
District Court, D. South Dakota
Decided December 8, 2000No. CIV 99-5018-KESPublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
SCHREIER, District Judge.
PROCEDURAL HISTORY
[¶ 1] Petitioner Ronald I. Goff seeks judicial review of the arbitration decision of the Public Law Board (Board) pursuant to the Railway Labor Act, 45 U.S.C. § 151-188. Goff argues that the Board’s decision was the result of fraud and was entered without procedural due process. The employer, Dakota, Minnesota & Eastern Railroad Corporation (DM & E), filed a counterclaim seeking enforcement of the award, or in the alternative, that the Board decision be vacated on public policy grounds. DM & E moved for summary judgment. Following…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- United Paperworkers International Union v. Misco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
- Elgin, Joliet & Eastern Railway Co. v. BurleySupreme Court of the United States · 1945
- Hawaiian Airlines, Inc. v. NorrisSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Consolidated Rail Corporation v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway v. BuellSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Brotherhood of Maintenance of Way Employees Division/IBT v. Norfolk Southern Railway Co.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2012