Legal Opinion

United States v. Roman

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided April 18, 2018No. Criminal Action No. 16–30020–MGM–2PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MARK G. MASTROIANNI, United States District Judge

I. INTRODUCTION

In applying for a warrant to search the business and residence of Jamil Roman ("Defendant"), the Government alleged in an affidavit that a confidential informant ("CS") obtained four kilograms of cocaine at Defendant's business, TWC Auto Body, located at 56 Jackson Street, Holyoke, Massachusetts. However, CS-upon agreeing to cooperate with federal law enforcement-affirmed in a written statement that the cocaine was actually delivered to CS's business, located at 712 Boston Road, Springfield, Massachusetts. In light of this…

2Cases cited35 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Franks v. DelawareSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  3. Zurcher v. Stanford DailySupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. United States v. Robert H. Davis, United States of America v. George D. GelestinoCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
  5. United States v. Christopher FrazierCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2005

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. United States v. RomanCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 2019
  2. United States v. RomanDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2018

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API