Legal Opinion

Christopher v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1989No. Appeal 82 C.D. 1988PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Smith,

Bill J. Christopher (Claimant) appeals from the order of the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which affirmed the referee’s decision denying Claimant’s reinstatement petition under The Pennsylvania Workmen’s Compensation Act.1 Quéstions presented for review are whether the referee and Board erred in considering evidence based upon a medical examination conducted five days prior to suspension of Claimant’s benefits; whether the referee and Board erred in determining that Claimant failed to sustain his burden of proving a continuing disability; and whether the…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Russell v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  2. Scobbie v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Economy Decorators, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  4. Goodyear v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1986

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Hertz-Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  2. Larocca v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Wells-Moore v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  4. Bortz v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1995
  5. Hertz Penske Truck Leasing Co. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1994

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API