Legal Opinion

Chamberlain MacHine Works v. United States

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided March 1, 1926No. 123PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Sanford

The Chamberlain Machine Works filed its petition in the Court of Claims to recover compensation for the partial performance • of a war contract for the machining of steel shells, which had been cancelled by the United States before completion, pursuant to the terms of the contract. The petition was dismissed on demurrer, without opinion. 59 Ct. Cls. 972. The appeal was allowed in June, 1924.

The petition and an exhibit thereto disclosed that the claim was originally prosecuted in the War Department, under the Dent Act, in. yarious proceedings before the Ordinance Section of the Claims Board,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Fogg v. BlairSupreme Court of the United States · 1891
  2. St. Louis, Kennett & Southeastern Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  3. Nesmith v. SheldonSupreme Court of the United States · 1849
  4. Cairo, Truman & Southern Railroad v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1925
  5. Perkins—campbell Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1924

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. In Re Initial Public Offering Securities LitigationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 2003
  2. Baskett v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1983
  3. Meeker v. BaxterCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1936
  4. Girard Trust Bank v. MartinCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1977
  5. Chicago Title & Trust Co. v. Fox Theatres CorporationDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1960

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API