In re L.H., L.H. and L.H., Juveniles
Supreme Court of Vermont
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
¶ 1. This case requires us to consider whether a court may terminate parents' parental rights following a hearing in which, over an objection, the State was represented by the same lawyer who had previously represented the children in the same matter. Mother and father separately appeal the court's order terminating their parental rights with respect to three of their daughters. We do not address many of their challenges to the trial court's findings and conclusions because we conclude that a conflict of interest by the State's counsel compromised the proceedings.
Accordingly, we reverse and…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- Santosky v. KramerSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- In Re Celine R.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Parker v. Town of MiltonSupreme Court of Vermont · 1998
- State v. MinerSupreme Court of Vermont · 1969
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- In re C.B., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2020
- In Re G.L., JuvenileSupreme Court of Vermont · 2024
- Weaver v. WeaverSupreme Court of Vermont · 2018
- In Re J.B., D.B., E.B., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2025
- In re K.H., K.H., K.D., JuvenilesSupreme Court of Vermont · 2023
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.