Introducing ATLASLearn more
Legal Opinion

United States v. Calp

District Court, D. Maryland

Decided March 10, 1949No. 21276PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CHESNUT, District Judge.

In this case the defendant on February

6, 1948 pleaded guilty to a criminal information in three counts for violation of United States Code Annotated, title 18, § 408 [now §§ 2311-2313], relating to the interstate transportation of known stolen automobiles. At that time he also signed and there was filed his written waiver of prosecution by indictment, and consent that the proceeding might be by information instead of by indictment. When arraigned he was asked whether he wished a lawyer appointed to represent him and answered that he did not. He also stated that he knew…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. McNabb v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. Von Moltke v. GilliesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  4. Upshaw v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
  5. Lee v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1948

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. United States v. John Eugene KniessCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1959
  2. Hayman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1951
  3. Bernard v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1949
  4. United States v. BiceDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1949
  5. United States v. Roland E. Derosier, United States of America v. Alexander Yorkey KreffkaCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1956

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

View API DocsGet API Key

Powered by the Exa API