Lee v. Mississippi
Supreme Court of the United States
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Murphy
This case involves a question of procedure under the due process clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the United States Constitution. Does a defendant in a state criminal proceeding lose the right to contend that a confession was coerced because of his testimony that the confession was in fact never made?
Petitioner, a 17-year-old Negro, was indicted by a grand jury in Mississippi on a charge of assault with intent to ravish a female of previous chaste character. During the course of the trial, the state offered the testimony of two city detectives as to an alleged oral confession obtained by…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Lisenba v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
- Haley v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Brown v. MississippiSupreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Chambers v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- Malinski v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Shelley v. KraemerSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Culombe v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Rogers v. RichmondSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
- Spano v. New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Shotwell Manufacturing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.