Legal Opinion

Khazali v. State of Washington

District Court, W.D. Washington

Decided June 7, 2023No. 2:23-cv-00796Unknown

1Opinion

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WASHINGTON 8 AT SEATTLE 9 10 MASOUD KHAZALI, CASE NO. C23-0796JLR 11 Plaintiff, ORDER v. 12 STATE OF WASHINGTON, 13 Defendant. 14 15 I. INTRODUCTION 16 Before the court is Plaintiff Masoud Khazali’s complaint against Defendant the 17 State of Washington. (Compl. (Dkt. # 5).) Mr. Khazali is proceeding pro se and in forma 18 pauperis (“IFP”). (See generally id.; IFP Order (Dkt. # 4).) The court has reviewed Mr. 19 Khazali’s complaint and has determined that the allegations therein fail to state a claim 20 upon which relief can be…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
  2. Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
  3. Will v. Michigan Department of State PoliceSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  4. Lopez v. SmithCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2000
  5. Pennhurst State School and Hospital v. HaldermanSupreme Court of the United States · 1984

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API