Legal Opinion
Arthur Thompson v. F.B.I., et al.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 27, 2025No. 2:25-cv-04510Unknown
1Opinion
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF PENNSYLVANIA ARTHUR THOMPSON, : Plaintiff, : : v. : CIVIL ACTION NO. 25-CV-4510 : F.B.I., et al., : Defendants. : MEMORANDUM Marston, J. October 27, 2025 This is one of several civil cases filed by pro se Plaintiff Arthur Thompson in which he claims that his constitutional rights have been violated by his pending federal prosecutions for unlawful possession of firearms. For the following reasons, the Court will dismiss Thompson’s claims as legally frivolous and deny his in forma pauperis motion as moot. I. FACTUAL ALLEGATIONS1 In…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Neitzke v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of NarcoticsSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
- Federal Deposit Insurance v. MeyerSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Central Bank of Denver, N. A. v. First Interstate Bank of Denver, N. A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Kareem Garrett v. Wexford HealthCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2019
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.