Legal Opinion

A. Hirschberg James Loudon & Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 15, 1958No. C. D. 2017PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

The subject of this protest is a thoroughbred stallion named “Loyola,” imported from Mexico on December 22, 1947. Duty was assessed by the collector under paragraph 714 of the Tariff Act of 1930, as modified by the trade agreement with the United Kingdom, T. D. 49753, at 17%, per centum ad valorem, as a horse valued at more than $150. It is claimed that the horse is entitled to free entry under paragraph 1606 of said tariff act as an animal imported by a citizen of the United States specially for breeding purposes.

The entry was liquidated on April 27, 1950, and three protests…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1951
  2. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  3. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966
  2. Humphreys v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API