Legal Opinion

E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided July 31, 1951No. C. D. 1356PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Johnson, Judge:

This case involves the classification of cows imported for breeding purposes. The cattle were entered at the port ■of Ogdensburg, N. Y. Entry 877 covered 19 cows imported for dairy purposes upon which duty was paid at iy2 cents per pound under the provisions of paragraph 701, Tariff Act of 1930, as amended by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade, T. D. 51802, and 1 purebred Jersey cow, imported for breeding purposes. Entry 887 covered 13 cows imported for dairy purposes, upon which duty was paid under paragraph 701, as amended, and 1 purebred Jersey cow and 2 purebred…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. E. Dillingham, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1939

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1956
  2. Carey & Skinner, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1954
  3. A. Hirschberg James Loudon & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1958
  4. Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1964
  5. Air Express International Agency, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API