Legal Opinion
Blau v. Hodgkinson
District Court, S.D. New York
Decided August 3, 1951PublishedCited by 23 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
LEIBELL, District Judge.
Both plaintiff and defendants have moved for a summary judgment. ' Plaintiffs claim is based on § 16(b) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, 15 U.S.C.A. § 78p(b). 1 The Securities and Exchange Commission has filed a brief amicus curiae.
The defendants’ notice of motion under 'Rule 56 Fed.Rules Civ.Proc. 28 U.S.C.A. asks the Court:
“1. To enter summary judgment in favor of defendants Harold D. Hodgkin-son, Fred Lazarus, Jr. and Jeffrey L. Lazarus dismissing the action on, the ground that there is no genuine issue as to any material facts and that defendants are…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Addison v. Holly Hill Fruit Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Smolowe v. Delendo CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1943
- Gratz v. ClaughtonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1951
- Park & Tilford, Inc. v. SchulteCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1947
- United States Ex Rel. Louisville Cement Co. v. Interstate Commerce CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1918
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by23 opinions
- Leo Vine v. Beneficial Finance Company, Inc., and Charles H. Dowd, Stuart A. Wixson, George J. Springer, C. H. Donohue and Crown Finance Company, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1967
- Kern County Land Co. v. Occidental Petroleum Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Pellegrino v. NesbitCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1953
- Nicholas Ferraiolo v. F. R. NewmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1958
- Blau v. LambCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1966
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.