Legal Opinion
Diez v. Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing
Court of Appeals of Minnesota
Decided June 17, 1997No. C5-97-83PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
SCHUMACHER, Judge.
In this age discrimination case, appellant Donald E. Diez challenges the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Minnesota Mining & Manufacturing (3M), arguing there are genuine issues of material fact. We affirm.
FACTS
Diez worked for 3M from 1962 until August 1, 1992, when he retired at age 58 from 3M’s Tape Group as part of a voluntary severance plan. Diez’s salary grade had been reduced in 1990, but because he believed that he continued to do the same work, he requested in 1992 that his job be reevaluated so he could regain his former salary grade.
At…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- State Ex Rel. Cooper v. FrenchSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- James JOHNSON and Benjamin White, Appellants, v. BUNNY BREAD COMPANY, AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1981
- Eric Crawford v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster General, United States Postal ServiceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1994
- Beshears v. AsbillCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Sandra Smith v. Ashland, Inc., a Kentucky Corporation, Doing Business as Ashland Petroleum, Formerly Known as Ashland Oil & Refining CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2001
- Colenburg v. Starcon International, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Hamblin v. Alliant Techsystems, Inc.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2001
- Nicole LaPoint v. Family Orthodontics, P. A.Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015
- Colenburg v. Starcon International, Inc.District Court, D. Minnesota · 2009
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.