Legal Opinion
Perez v. Kroger Co.
District Court, C.D. California
Decided September 28, 2018No. Case No. 2:17-cv-02448-ODW (AGR)PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OTIS D. WRIGHT, II, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
I. INTRODUCTION
Plaintiff Sonia Perez ("Perez"), on behalf of herself and the putative class members she seeks to represent, alleges that Defendant The Kroger Co.'s ("Kroger") use of the statement "No Sugar Added" on Kroger Apple Juice1 violates the Food and Drug Administration ("FDA") regulations, specifically 21 C.F.R. § 101.60(c)(2)(iv). (Second Am. Compl. ("SAC") ¶¶ 1-2, 5-7, ECF. No. 35.) In particular, the FDA regulation sets forth five provisions in which *1140the terms "no sugar added," "without added sugar," or "no added sugar" may be used.…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Scott v. HarrisSupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Auer v. RobbinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1997
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Benjamin Robert Gallegos v. B. EbertDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
- Harner v. USAA General Indemnity CompanyDistrict Court, S.D. California · 2022
- Shaeffer v. Califia Farms, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020