Legal Opinion
Ex parte Seen Lee
District Court, W.D. Washington
Decided October 16, 1930No. 20410PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
NETERER, District Judge.
The finding of the Commissioner of Immigration and Secretary of Labor, there being some evidence, must be sustained. It is not for the court to weigh the testimony.
The birth certificate filed fourteen or fifteen years after the birth is of no probative value, Nagle v. Dong Ming (C. C. A.) 26 F.(2d) 438; and pregnant is this conclusion as to the fact by the statement of the doctor that he had no data from which to register this birth and that no one caused him to register it at that late date, and that he did not know the party registered, nor have any record in his…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Vajtauer v. Commissioner of ImmigrationSupreme Court of the United States · 1927
- Chin Yow v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
- Low Wah Suey v. BackusSupreme Court of the United States · 1912
- Gung You v. NagleCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1929
- Nagle v. Dong MingCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Ex parte Lee Fong FookDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1948
- Harris v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1958