Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Starbucks Corporation

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided August 4, 2025No. 7:24-cv-06266Unknown

1Opinion

Case Docket Number 24-CV-6266 7/21/2025 Case Name SummerAnnie N. Johnson V. StarBucks Corporate Office To: United States District Court Southern District Of New York I respectfully request that the Court stay this action pending arbitration. The Supreme Court recently made clear that “[w]hen a district court finds that a lawsuit involves an arbitrable dispute, and a party requests a stay pending arbitration, § 3 of the FAA compels *421 the court to stay the proceeding.” Smith v. Spizzitri, 601 U.S. 472, 478, 1448. Ct. 1173,

218 L.Ed.2d 494

(2024); accord Kaiz v. Cellco P'ship,

794 F.3d 341, 345

(2d…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Katz v. Cellco PartnershipCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2015
  2. Smith v. SpizzirriSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
  3. Retirement Committee of Dak Americas LLC v. SmithDistrict Court, E.D. North Carolina · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API