Legal Opinion

Setzkorn v. City of Buffalo

New York Supreme Court

Decided April 2, 1926PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHinkley, J.

This appeal presents a very novel and interesting question: Is the common master liable for the negligent act of one servant causing damage to the property of a fellow-servant while both servants are engaged at the time in the service of the master?

On June 9, 1924, about midday, plaintiff was seated in his own automobile which he had parked along the southerly curb of North street in the city of Buffalo. Plaintiff, at the time, was employed by "the defendant municipality as an inspector in the bureau of engineering, and was actually engaged at the time in such service, but using his own…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Crispin v. . BabbittNew York Court of Appeals · 1880
  2. Barbaroux v. BarkerCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1862
  3. Kay v. Metropolitan Street Railway Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1900
  4. Laning v. . N.Y.C.R.R. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1872
  5. Russell v. . the Hudson River Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1858

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Setzkorn v. City of BuffaloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1927
  2. Holcombe v. United StatesDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 1959

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API