Legal Opinion
Mille v. McManigal
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit
Decided March 5, 1934No. 304PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PEE CUEIAM.
This is a petition for a mandamus to compel a deputy commissioner under the Longshoremen’s and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act (chapter 18, §§ 901-950, title 33 USCA), to hear an application to increase an award. The petitioner, a longshoreman, was injured during his employment, and the deputy commissioner granted him an award for a term which had already expired when it was granted. At that time his injuries were thought to be slight, but later they turned out to be much more severe. After the lapse of more than two years from the grant of the award, the plaintiff made an…
2Cited by11 opinions
- United States Ex Rel. Vassel v. DurningCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1945
- Gravel Products Corporation v. McManigalDistrict Court, W.D. New York · 1936
- Didier v. Crescent Wharf & Warehouse Co.District Court, S.D. California · 1936
- Di Costanzo v. WillardDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1958
- Swofford v. International Mercantile Marine Co.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.