Legal Opinion

Winston & Strawn LLP v. the Law Firm of John Arthur Eaves

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided November 24, 2014No. Civil Action No. 2013-1940PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

ALAN KAY, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Pending before the Court is Defendant’s Motion for Protective Order (“Def.’s MPO”) [21], and Plaintiffs opposition thereto (“Pl.’s Opposition to MPO”) [22]; Defendant’s Motion for Extension of Discovery Deadline (“Defs Motion for Extension”) [25] and Plaintiffs Opposition thereto (Pl.’s Opposition to Motion for Extension”) [26]; and Plaintiffs Motion for Protective Order (“Pl.’s MPO”) [27]. 1 This Court held a telephonic status conference on November 20, 2014, to discuss outstanding discovery and the pending motions. During that…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Fisher v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc. Samuel Friedman v. Bache Halsey Stuart Shields, Inc.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1984
  3. United States v. Kellogg Brown & Root Services, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  4. United States v. Philip Morris Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2004
  5. National Community Reinvestment Coalition v. Novastar Financial, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2009

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Federal Trade Commission v. Match Group, Inc.District Court, District of Columbia · 2023

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API