Legal Opinion

Spangler v. Atchison, T. & S. F. R.

U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Western Missouri

Decided May 5, 1890PublishedCited by 12 opinions

At Law. On motion to remand.

1Opinion of the CourtPhilips, J.

This action was brought in the circuit court of Jackson county, Mo., returnable to the October term, 1889. Under the state statute (section 3514) the defendants were required to answer by the 16th day of October, 1889, which was the third day of the term. On the first day of the term the defendant the Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railroad Company appeared, and, by an ex parte order of the court, the time for answering was extended to the 1st day of November following. On the 30th day of October the defendant filed answer, and presented petition and bond for a removal to this court, which order…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gregory v. HartleySupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Pullman Palace Car Co. v. SpeckSupreme Court of the United States · 1885

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Wilcox & Gibbs Guano Co. v. Phoenix Ins. Co.U.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Carolina · 1894
  2. Ruby Canyon Gold Min. Co. v. HunterU.S. Circuit Court for the District of South Dakota · 1894
  3. Patterson v. Champion Lumber Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Tracy v. MorelU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Nebraska · 1898
  5. Wilson v. Big Joe Block Coal Co.Supreme Court of Iowa · 1907

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API