Legal Opinion

Gibson v. Dunham

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided October 6, 1959No. 38073PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WILLIAMS, Vice Chief Justice.

Defendants below appeal from a judg-⅜ ment determining and foreclosing a mate-; rialman’s lien. Parties are referred to as they appeared in the trial court.

Defendants entered, into an oral contract with one Jarret Milam in March, 1956, for a limited remodeling and an addition to their home. The terms were for a “turnkey” job at a price of $1,270. Plaintiff furnished, on orders of Milam or his employees, all of the materials used on this job. Milam, just before the work was completed, obtained a check from defendants for $1,000. This check was made payable to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Consolidated Cut Stone Co. v. SeidenbachSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1937
  2. Ganas v. TselosSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1932

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. CASHWAY LUMBER COMPANY v. LangstonSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  2. Kirkpatrick v. Jacobson's Lifetime Buildings, Inc.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1970
  3. Knapp v. Arko Interstate Electric Co.Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1968
  4. Shugart v. LF Platt Lumber CompanySupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1963
  5. Shumate v. Prague National BankSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1961

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API