Legal Opinion

Farmer v. McColm

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided September 25, 1961No. 19528PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Mr. Justice McWilliams.

The primary issue to be determined on this writ of error is the propriety of an order of the trial court directing the jury in a personal injury action to return a verdict in favor of the defendant, one McColm. The plaintiff, Farmer, seeks reversal of the judgment of dismissal entered pursuant to the directed verdict. We now hold that the trial court erred in directing the jury to return a verdict for the defendant, such error necessitating reversal and a new trial consonant with the views herein expressed.

The pleadings are in the usual and accepted form:…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Julius Hyman & Co. v. Velsicol Corp.Supreme Court of Colorado · 1951
  2. Westesen v. Olathe State BankSupreme Court of Colorado · 1924
  3. Gordon v. ClotsworthySupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  4. Yockey Trucking Co. v. HandySupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  5. Stocker v. NewcombSupreme Court of Colorado · 1932

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Little Thompson Water Association v. StrawnSupreme Court of Colorado · 1970
  2. Staples v. LangleySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  3. Frank v. WhinerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961
  4. Frank v. WhinerySupreme Court of Colorado · 1961

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API