Legal Opinion

Stocker v. Newcomb

Supreme Court of Colorado

Decided October 31, 1932No. 12,616PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Adams

Mrs. Stocker sued Mrs. Neweomh to recover damages for personal injuries sustained in an automobile collision. We refer to the parties as plaintiff and defendant, as aligned at the trial. At the close of plaintiff’s testimony, the court overruled defendant’s motion for a nonsuit, but at the close of all testimony, directed a verdict for defendant. Judgment of dismissal followed and plaintiff assigns error.

The evidence shows that the scene of the collision was at the intersection of Thirteenth avenue and Detroit street, in the city of Denver. Thirteenth avenue runs east and west, and Detroit…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Boyd v. CloseSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  2. Arps v. City & County of DenverSupreme Court of Colorado · 1927
  3. Sprague v. HerbelSupreme Court of Colorado · 1931

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Flynn v. Helena Cab & Bus Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1933
  2. Schell v. KullhemSupreme Court of Colorado · 1953
  3. Cudney v. MooreSupreme Court of Colorado · 1967
  4. Grunsfeld v. YetterSupreme Court of Colorado · 1937
  5. Woods v. SiegristSupreme Court of Colorado · 1944

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API