Legal Opinion · Concurrence

Durst v. Southern Railway Co.

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided December 10, 1924No. 11629Published

1Concurrence

Acting Associate Justice B. A. Morgan

(concurring): Action by Mrs. George W. Durst, Jr., with whom her husband was joined as plaintiff, for damages on account of alleged personal injuries received by her while a passenger upon the train of the defendant company, caused by the negligence of the defendant Williams, flagman on the train.

It appears from the undisputed evidence that the immediate injury to Mrs. Durst happened in this way: Above the aisle of the car, about midway, there was a large kerosene lamp, which rested in a bracket attached to the ceiling; it was held in place by a catch; on…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Williams v. HinesSupreme Court of Florida · 1920
  2. Schumpert v. Southern Ry.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1903
  3. Jones v. Southern Ry. Co.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1916
  4. Central of Georgia Railway Co. v. WeathersSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
  5. Anderson v. South Carolina & Georgia R. R.Supreme Court of South Carolina · 1907

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API