Legal Opinion

Moeschen v. Tenement House Department of the New York

Supreme Court of the United States

Decided November 12, 1906No. 93PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In error to the Supreme Court of the State of New York.

2Per curiam

Judgment affirmed with costs. Boston Beer Company v. Massachusetts, 97 U. S. 25, 32; Powell v. Pennsylvania, 127 U. S. 678; United States v. Des Moines &c. Company, 142 U. S. 510, 544; Holden v. Hardy, 169 U. S. 366; Atkin v. Kansas, 191 U. S. 207; Jacobson v. Massachusetts, 197 U. S. 11; Gardner v. Michigan, 199 U. S. 325; case below, 89 App. Div. 526; 179 N. Y. 325. And see Health Department v. Rector &c., 145 N. Y. 32; Harrington v. Board of Aldermen, *58420 R. I. 233; Commonwealth v. Roberts, 155 Massachusetts, 281.

Mr. Adolph Bloch for…

3Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Jacobson v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1905
  2. Holden v. HardySupreme Court of the United States · 1898
  3. Beer Co. v. MassachusettsSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
  4. Powell v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  5. Atkin v. KansasSupreme Court of the United States · 1903

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

4Cited by17 opinions

  1. Edgar A. Levy Leasing Co. v. SiegelSupreme Court of the United States · 1922
  2. Lincoln Trust Co. v. Williams Building Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1920
  3. Weksler v. CollinsIllinois Supreme Court · 1925
  4. Matter of McIntosh v. . JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1914
  5. People v. MartinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1922

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API