Legal Opinion

Endicott v. Display Technologies, Inc.

Supreme Court of Missouri

Decided June 25, 2002No. SC 84044PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUANE BENTON, Judge.

The Labor and Industrial Relations Commission awarded workers’ compensation benefits against two employers, based on the dates of diagnosis of Norman Endi-cott’s diseases. One employer — Display Technologies, Inc. — argues it is not liable because it was not the last employer to expose Endicott to the hazard of his occupational diseases. The other employer— Graphic Technologies, Inc. — claims that it is not liable for two of Endicott’s diseases based on the dates of diagnosis, nor for his third disease (diagnosed during employment with GTI) because Endicott did not give…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Johnson v. Denton Construction Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1995
  2. Prater v. Thorngate, Ltd.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1988
  3. Weniger v. Pulitzer Publishing Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. Kintz v. Schnucks Markets, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1994
  5. Maxon v. Leggett & PlattMissouri Court of Appeals · 2000

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Junior College District of St. Louis v. City of St. LouisSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004
  2. Houston v. Roadway Express, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  3. Lewis v. GibbonsSupreme Court of Missouri · 2002
  4. Allcorn v. Tap Enterprises, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  5. Elrod v. Treasurer of Missouri as Custodian of the Second Injury FundSupreme Court of Missouri · 2004

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API