Legal Opinion
Krotz Springs Oil & Mineral Water Co. v. Shirk
Supreme Court of Louisiana
Decided March 2, 1931No. 30689PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSt. Paul, J.
This case was here once before on exceptions (see 165 La. 1005, 116 So. 488, 489), and the case is there stated thus:
“The object of this suit is to compel the administrator of the succession of Elbert Walker Shirk to execute a deed to certain lands, described in the petition, under an alleged agreement entered into with C. W. Krotz, whose rights are claimed to have been acquired by the plaintiff company. After the alleged agreement to sell, Shirk sold some of the land to other persons, and they are made eodefendants for the purpose of having their deeds canceled. The codefendants are the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Eastham v. Melville Land Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1917
- Krotz Springs Oil & Mineral Water Co. v. ShirkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1928
3Cited by3 opinions
- Price v. Town of RustonLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1932
- Tholl Oil Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1941
- Succession of KreherSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1934