Legal Opinion

Tholl Oil Co. v. Miller

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided May 26, 1941No. 34325PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HIGGINS, Justice.

The plaintiff instituted this proceeding against the administrators of the estate of J. M. Miller, to have cancelled and erased from the public records the recordation of a contract with an option to purchase, alleging that Miller had never given any notice that he intended to exercise the option as required by the contract, had made on demands under the contract, and had neither paid nor tendered any part of the stipulated purchase price, but, on the contrary, by subsequent verbal agreements between Miller and the plaintiff, the option had been revoked.

The defendants denied…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Schleider v. DielmanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1892
  2. Elmer v. HartSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1908
  3. Parlor City Lumber Co. v. SandelSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1937
  4. Nickerson v. Allen Bros. & Wadley, Ltd.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1903
  5. Krotz Springs Oil & Mineral Water Co. v. ShirkSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1931

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Kaplan v. University Lake Corp.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1980
  2. Arceneaux v. AdamsLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1978
  3. Torrey v. Simon-Torrey, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1974
  4. Maryland Cas. Co., Etc. v. Watson, Etc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 1982
  5. Schoeny v. LakeLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1943

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API